There are tons of spoilers ahead, so tread knowingly.
The Lathe of Heaven is one of Le Guin’s shorter novels, but it
packs a big punch. It’s a dystopic novel
in which the dystopia is always changing because living in this Utopia is a man
whose dreams change the very fabric of reality.
It’s is trippy and heavy, funny and irreverent, sad and thought-provoking.
As in the best of her novels, in The Lathe of Heaven Le Guin uses her
unique world to tell the story of very human characters. There are three main characters in this story. George Orr, in his late 20s or early 30s is
the man whose dreams are at the center of the novel. He has been having his “effective” dreams
since he was 15 or 16, but they didn’t cause him much worry until four years before
the start of the novel. We learn that
something happened that April—we never know what, only that it was an action
that Orr worries was unjustified—that made Orr fear the power of his dreams to
change reality. At that point he started
to take drugs to keep himself from dreaming.
As the novel begins, George is delusional from having taken a dangerous
combination of drugs and is ordered by the state to go to Voluntary Therapy to
avoid a sentence.
Dr. Haber is the therapist George is assigned to. Haber is an oneirologist, a scientist of
sleep and dreams. He is a man of quick
judgments and conviction. After the
first session with George, Haber learns that the young man’s dreams can indeed
change the world. Haber wants to learn
how George does it and wants to use the power of those dreams to make the world
a better place. As the novel starts, the
earth’s population is stretched to its limit while climate change was ruined
food production so there is very little for very many people. But George’s dream-power is like the cursed
monkey paw, and every changes Haber brings about is accompanied by an unintended
shift. For example, Haber instructs George
to dream that there is plenty of elbow room for all, and the past is rewritten
so that there was a major population crash, wiping out 6 million people. Haber instructs George to dream of peace, and
history is rewritten so that all the countries of Earth are united . . .
against an alien species that has occupied our moon for years.
Heather Lelache is an attorney in Portland, Oregon (where the novel is
set), a hard-nosed attorney who takes civil rights cases. George comes to her when he suspects that
Haber is using George’s dream-power against George’s will. While our first impression of her is that she
is as strong-willed as Dr. Haber, her dismissal of George upon first meeting of
him gives way to gentler feelings and a drive to understand. She observes one of George’s sessions with
Dr. Haber in the name of the ACLU, making sure that the new technology Haber is
devising to work with George’s dreams is safe and legal. When George dreams, only he remembers the
past truths as well as the present truths, unless someone is with him when he
dreams, in which case that person two holds memory of the old and new
world. By witnessing the session,
Lelache learns the truth about what is happening.
These three characters and their relationships make up all the energy and
drama of the story, all with the backdrop of a rotating horror of global strife
and tragedy. No matter what George dreams,
the climate has been thoroughly ruined by corporate greed and human apathy. Man, I would love to see a quality mini-series
made of this book—it is perfect for what television can do today.
For all that, what is the book about?
Each chapter begins with a literary quote, most of which come from
Zhuangzi, both the author and the book.
I was unfamiliar with Zhuangzi or his writing, so I did a little research. Zhuangzi is a philosopher, and his tales are
about the mystery of the nature of reality and how to live in an uncertain
world. The title of the book, The
Lathe of Heaven, comes from chapter 23 of Zhuangzi, and is included as the
quote at the head of chapter 3 of the book:
Those whom heaven helps we call the sons of heaven. They do not learn this by learning. They do not work it by working. They do not reason it by using reason. To let understanding stop at what cannot be understood is a high attainment. Those who cannot do it will be destroyed on the lathe of heaven (26).
The Lathe of Heaven, taken as a whole, is a kind of parable that could
appear in Zhuangzi, if Zhuangzi was a modern work of science fiction. The philosophy at its core is one of balance
and acceptance, of being a part of the world even as you see yourself as apart
from it. That quote above is about
accepting and being a part of the world not through human action, but by
being. To not be, to push for your own
ends will lead to destruction upon the lathe of heaven. Be shaped by the will of heaven. To fight it and try to be the lathe yourself
will only end in horrors. Which is, of
course, precisely what happens to Dr. Haber.
He wishes to push his own will on the heavens and pays the ultimate
price for it, and makes a huge chunk of the world pay that price as well.
Orr, on the other hand, is a son of heaven, in the sense of the quote
above. George is the living embodiment
of balance, as we learn in chapter nine, when Haber tells him about the results
of his personality tests, calling him “the man in the middle of the graph.” For Haber, to be so centered is to be “self-cancel[ing]”:
“You cancel out so thoroughly that, in a sense, nothing is left.” A colleague of Haber’s proposes a different
reading: “he says your lack of social achievement is a result of your holistic
adjustment,” a notion Haber finds laughable, but that we can see the wisdom of.
We are told early on that
Orr was not a fast reasoner. In fact, he was not a reasoner. He arrived at ideas the slow way, never skating over the clear, hard ice of logic, nor soaring on the slipstreams of imagination, but slogging, plodding along on the heave ground of existence. He did not see connections, which is said to be the hallmark of intellect. He felt connections, like a plumber (39).
See how that connects to the sons of heaven? He does not reason it by using reason. He does not work it by working. And he is only too happy to let understanding
stop at what cannot be understood. After
the aliens come to Earth, George learns from them and rediscover this inner peace
by asking for their help. George snaps
back to a feeling of balance that abandoned him four years ago when he began
trying to control his dreaming. For
nearly 10 years before that, he dreamed easily and the world didn’t
suffer. (I admit that is an uncertain statement
to some degree, insofar as the world kinda sucked, and we have no idea how
George affected reality before the start of the novel. But whatever his dreams did or didn’t do, we
know that the lathe of heaven is turning and shaping him, using him to shape
the world, in the philosophy of the text.)
I’ve got much more buzzing around in my head than I have time to write
right now. I suspect that George Orr’s
name is a nod to George Orwell and simultaneously important because “or” is the
balancing point of alternatives. George can let both parts of the or exist without
tension or exclusion. There is no “either”
to George’s “or.” That would be a fun
path to pursue.
I would like to read a whole essay about Lelache, who is, I think, a crux
in the novel. She is introduced in
opposition to George just as Dr. Haber is, but she is no Haber. Her mixed racial background makes her almost
a living example of opposites meeting, so much so that her blackness is so crucial
to who she is that she cannot exist in the gray-skinned world Haber creates
through George’s dreams. I would love to
see an analysis of how Lelache matters to the themes of the novel. Because I think it’s a critical role she
plays.
I want to talk about the opening chapter and how George is like the
jellyfish in the ocean. I want to talk
about the Aldebararians and why they look like sea turtles, how they are the
eastern mystics, and why they talk out of their left elbow. I want to make connections between their
broken speech and George’s broken speech in the first chapter, in which we get
insight into the back story of his broken sentences while the listening
characters are clueless. I want to talk
about the snake poison analogy and its implications. I want to talk about the alien quoting
Macbeth and George responding with Hamlet.
There’s so much to think and talk about in this short novel because it is
insanely rich and beautifully crafted. Here,
Le Guin is at the top of her game. Read
it and write about all the things I couldn’t, please.
No comments:
Post a Comment